/ Modified aug 7, 2018 5:03 p.m.

2,700 Scientists: Planned Border Wall a Threat to Biodiversity

Scientists from 47 countries reviewed a scientific paper and concluded Trump's border wall will be an ecological disaster.

Border Wall Prototype Construction hero Still image from a video released by the public relations department of Customs and Border Protection showing the start to construction of border wall prototypes.
Customs and Border Protection via dvidshub.net

Around 2,700 scientists from 47 countries have signed a letter supporting a scientific paper by Defenders of Wildlife that concludes Donald Trump's border wall is a threat to biodiversity.

After more than six months of research, Defenders of Wildlife, a conservation nonprofit, submitted a scientific paper for peer review to the Geoscience Journal. The reaction from scientists all over the world was immediate and supportive.

The scientific paper documents the ecological harm of the type of fence and barrier construction that Donald Trump wants along the 2,000-mile U.S.-Mexico border.

In a letter, electronically signed by biologists, environmentalists and many who study the historical damages caused by man-made barriers, reads: "Fences and walls erected along international boundaries in the name of national security have unintended but significant consequences for biodiversity.

In fact, according to Defenders of Wildlife senior scientist Jenni Miller, the border barriers threaten the health of 1,500 species of plants and animals, including 62 endangered or vulnerable species.

Gary Nabhan 3 Gary Nabhan, Ph.D., W.K. Kellogg Chair in Southwest Borderlands Food and Water Security, is an ethnobiologist, agroecologist, conservation biologist and cultural geographer trained at the University of Arizona
Gary Nabhan

Nabhan lives in Patagonia, 60 miles south of Tucson. He is an internationally known agricultural ecologist with a Ph.D. from the University of Arizona. He signed the letter of support for the study by Defenders of Wildlife. He says scientists from all over the world, like him, have reviewed the research and signed the open letter condemning Trump's border wall as unscientific and irrational.

"To say the only way we can deal with human security is a wall — as opposed to electronic surveillance at the line or other means that have proven more effective — is a false pretense," Nabhan said.

Nabhan says the construction of the wall, not just the wall itself, will be an ecological disaster.

“Some of the desert areas are so fragile and have so little resilience that you can literally see tracks made 80 years ago in the desert," said Nabhan.

MORE: Environment, News
By posting comments, you agree to our
AZPM encourages comments, but comments that contain profanity, unrelated information, threats, libel, defamatory statements, obscenities, pornography or that violate the law are not allowed. Comments that promote commercial products or services are not allowed. Comments in violation of this policy will be removed. Continued posting of comments that violate this policy will result in the commenter being banned from the site.

By submitting your comments, you hereby give AZPM the right to post your comments and potentially use them in any other form of media operated by this institution.
AZPM is a service of the University of Arizona and our broadcast stations are licensed to the Arizona Board of Regents who hold the trademarks for Arizona Public Media and AZPM. We respectfully acknowledge the University of Arizona is on the land and territories of Indigenous peoples.
The University of Arizona