/ Modified oct 23, 2013 8:34 a.m.

Activists Ask Tucson City Council to Change Enforcement of SB1070

Immigration advocates want city to explore ways to comply with state law while reducing Border Patrol calls.

city council spotlight Leilani Clark, who said she was pepper sprayed at the Oct. 8 immigrant rights protest scene, prepares to address the City Council.
Yoohyun Jung


Dozens of immigrant rights activists asked the Tucson City Council Tuesday to change how Tucson police enforce Arizona’s anti-illegal immigration law, SB 1070.

On Oct. 8, police officers called the Border Patrol after believing the two men stopped for a traffic violation were in the country illegally.

The incident brought people to the site to protest the officers’ enforcement of SB 1070 and started a series of demonstrations.

“This incident is a direct display of the violence that takes place when you have this direct collaboration between local law enforcement and military," said Leilani Clark, who said she was pepper sprayed during the confrontation. "The Department of Homeland Security is military."

city council focus large 1 Immigrant rights advocates at Tuesday's City Council meeting protesting enforcement of SB 1070.
Yoohyun Jung

Clark, like many speakers at the council meeting, said the enforcement of immigration law by local law enforcement is separating the community.

“We will not stop the resistance against unjust laws like SB 1070, and we will continue to show opposition to laws that only separate families,” she said. “We are calling actively for TPD to stop calling Border Patrol.”

Council members did not address the public’s comments but will discuss the issue at its Nov. 13 meeting, Councilman Steve Kozachik said.

“The relationship between our law enforcement and the local Latino community is absolutely going into the tank, and it is now becoming incumbent on us as a governing body to do what we can within the context law of the law,” Kozachik said. “We can’t go tell TPD to violate the law. People stand up there and say stop enforcing SB 1070 … we’ll get sued. But we can do some things procedurally that will kind of ease the tension.”

SB 1070 was signed into law in 2010, and its provision requiring police to question those suspected of being illegal immigrants and then contact federal authorities was upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court last year. That provision is known as Section 2B.

Andrew Silverman, an immigration law professor at the University of Arizona James E. Rogers College of Law, said at Tuesday's meeting that police should adopt procedures when implementing section 2B to comply with Tucson’s “Immigrant Welcoming City” initiative.

“Now we have SB 1070, and that’s what’s put forward by law enforcement that we have no choice now,” he said. “Well, we have a lot of choices under Section 2B, that is the ‘show me your papers’ section. There are qualifiers, like reasonable suspicion, that must exist when practicable.”

Police Chief Roberto Villaseñor has said he opposes SB 1070 but the law itself requires his officers to enforce it.

By posting comments, you agree to our
AZPM encourages comments, but comments that contain profanity, unrelated information, threats, libel, defamatory statements, obscenities, pornography or that violate the law are not allowed. Comments that promote commercial products or services are not allowed. Comments in violation of this policy will be removed. Continued posting of comments that violate this policy will result in the commenter being banned from the site.

By submitting your comments, you hereby give AZPM the right to post your comments and potentially use them in any other form of media operated by this institution.
Arizona Public Media broadcast stations are licensed to the Arizona Board of Regents. Arizona Public Media and AZPM are registered trademarks of the Arizona Board of Regents.
The University of Arizona