Steve KozachikOn expanding bus routes: We're continuing to invest in our Frequent Transit Network in areas where density and ridership warrants.
On expanding light rail: That will require federal funding. The currently debated infrastructure bill contains some money earmarked for that. We're already considering possible routes.
On widening roads: No - widening roads leads to greater congestion and people driving at higher speeds. Our focus should be on making our roadways safer by slowing traffic, not incentivizing more traffic at higher speeds.
On repairing existing roads: Yes - we've invested over $200M so far and have another ballot measure called for next May.
On adding sidewalks: In consultation with neighborhoods, yes. Some don't want sidewalks. Some do. Any that go in must be ADA compliant. Our Prop 407 dollars are already investing in connectivity amenities like this, but any must be done in consultation with residents. Along arterials, yes. With tree canopy and wide enough to allow local restaurants to expand w/outdoor seating.
On adding crosswalks:Only when they can be augmented with added safety features such as flashers or HAWK lights. Just painting lines on the ground isn't enough.
On adding traffic calming features: Yes, where neighbors request them. I've successfully advocated for reduced cost speed tables, and have added Green Stormwater Infrastructure money to help with calming features such as chicanes and traffic circles. All must be done with access for public safety vehicles in mind.
On adding lighting along roads: Along arterials, yes. Not all neighborhoods want added lighting, so that's a conversation we have regularly. Any new lighting must be Dark Skies compliant to protect our astronomy industry.
On adding bike paths:Yes, and we're doing this through the $225M we're investing in parks and connectivity through Prop 407.
Val RomeroOn buses: I would need a report on this, asking questions about things like which routes are working and which are not, number of riders on routes, is this a good return on investment, are we serving citizens using this mode of transportation, and do we need to focus more routes downtown and on the Sunshine Mile.
On expanding light rail: No, this would be cost-prohibitive and not a financially good return on our investment. We could perhaps consider this in the future, but not now.
On widening roads: Not necessarily widen roads, but repair and maintain them, as well as working with the federal or State government to assist us in creating a west-to-east, east-to-west freeway corridor. This would help constrain our CO2 footprint with emissions produced by stop-and-go traffic, with less traffic and thus less wear and tear on our streets. I think we need to look at solutions for future problems and not just put a band-aid on our current ones.
On adding sidewalks: Repair and maintain sidewalks, not add. Elderly walkers and wheelchair-bound citizens have trouble navigating the uneven sidewalks -- during my canvassing, I tripped and stumbled many times walking on our sidewalks… sometimes it is safer to walk in the street and take on traffic because of their poor condition.
On adding crosswalks: Only in population-dense areas where it makes sense to add them.
On adding traffic calming features: I assume you mean speed bumps; a traffic calming feature to me would be a Zen Garden and a waterfall on the side of the road. There are key locations for speed bumps and speed plateaus, and they should be used as an option as needed.
On adding light along roads: I would have to defer to the 2012 City of Tucson/Pima County Outdoor Lighting Code Adopted by City of Tucson ordinance #10963 on February 7, 2012, and work off of our current code.
On adding bike paths: In certain areas this makes sense, but city-wide it does not. I am sure there are not many people working at Raytheon who bike to work or take the bus.